# Double copy
The double copy is a relation between graviton amplitudes and gluons amplitudes, or more generally between the scattering amplitudes of two different theories.
Since perturbation theory is far simpler in [[0071 Yang-Mills|YM]] theory than in standard approaches to gravity, the double copy is a very powerful relation.
The idea of double copy is not restricted to amplitude, though, as some gravity *solutions* are related to [[0071 Yang-Mills|YM]] solutions in a double-copy fashion.
## Origin
- long ago, it was found that the Veneziano scattering amplitude [[Veneziano1968]], A(s, t), (later identified as an open-string scattering amplitude) and the Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude ([[Virasoro1969]] and [[Shapiro1969]]), M(s, t, u), (later identified as a closed-string amplitude) are related: $M(s, t, u)=\frac{\sin \left(\pi \alpha^{\prime} s\right)}{\pi \alpha^{\prime}} A(s, t) A(s, u)$
- in the low energy limit, this reduces to the [[0554 Einstein gravity|GR]]-[[0071 Yang-Mills|YM]] double copy: $\mathcal{M}_{4}^{\text {tree }}(1,2,3,4)=\left(\frac{\kappa}{2}\right)^{2} s A_{4}^{\text {tree }}(1,2,3,4) A_{4}^{\text {tree }}(1,2,4,3)$
## Classification
- early days [[0398 KLT relations]]
- then [[0152 Colour-kinematics duality|BCJ relations]]
- even better (in [[0234 Self-dual gravity]] and [[0136 Self-dual Yang-Mills]]): [[2011#Monteiro, O'Connell]]
## Using [[0152 Colour-kinematics duality]]
- starting from [[0071 Yang-Mills|YM]] amplitude $A\left(1_{a} 2_{b} 3_{c} 4_{d}\right)=\frac{c_{s} n_{s}}{s}+\frac{c_{t} n_{t}}{t}+\frac{c_{u} n_{u}}{u}$
- replace colour factors by kinematic factors
- get graviton amplitude: $A_{4}\left(1^{--} 2^{--} 3^{++} 4^{++}\right)=\frac{n_{s}^{2}}{s}+\frac{n_{t}^{2}}{t}+\frac{n_{u}^{2}}{u}=-\frac{\langle 12\rangle^{4}[34]^{4}}{s t u}$
- more generally: $\mathcal{M}_{m}^{\text {tree }}=\left.\mathcal{A}_{m}^{\text {tree }}\right|_{c_{i} \rightarrow n_{i}}$=\sum_{\tau \in S_{m-2}} A_{m}^{\text {tree }}(1, \tau(2, \ldots, m-1), m) n(1, \tau(2, \ldots, m-1), m)$=-i \sum_{\sigma, \rho \in S_{m-3}} A_{m}^{\text {tree }}(1, \sigma, m-1, m) S[\sigma|\rho] \tilde{A}_{m}^{\text {tree }}(1, \rho, m, m-1)$
## Related topics
- [[0398 KLT relations]]
- [[0152 Colour-kinematics duality]]
## Refs
- recent review
- [[2019#Bern, Carrasco, Chiodaroli, Johansson, Roiban (Review)]]
- for EFTs
- [[2012#Broedel, Dixon]]: $F^3$, $R^3$, $F^4$, $\phi R^2$, etc.
- [[BonnefoyDurieuxGrojeanMachadoNepveu2021]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.11453.pdf)
- in AdS
- [[Zhou2021]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.07651.pdf)
- [[HerderscheeRoibanTeng2022]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.05067.pdf)
- [[CheungParra-MartinezSivaramakrishnan2022]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.05147.pdf)
- [[BissiFardelliManentiZhou2022]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.01204.pdf)
- [[Li2022]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.13195.pdf)
- using twisted forms
- [[2022#Mazloumi, Stieberger]]
- recent
- [[DelaCruzMaybeeOConnellRoss2020]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.03842.pdf)
- [[MonteiroOConnellVeigaSergola2020]][](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.11190.pdf): in split signature
## Comments
- in the presence of adjoint-rep. fermions, the duality implies SUSY [[ChiodaroliJinRoiban2013]]
## GR from collinear limit of [[0071 Yang-Mills|YM]]
- [[2015#Stieberger, Taylor (Feb)]]
## Double copy of asymptotic symmetry
- [[2024#Ferrero, Francia, Heissenberg, Romoli]]
<!--
Relation to AdS/CFT
(Mukund) I have been thinking about the question I was asked yesterday in the discussion regarding the connection between double copy and open/closed duality. As was pointed out in the discussion by, the former is a statement about relating two perturbative descriptions, while the latter is a strong/weak duality. One should perhaps interpret a potential double copy in the bulk as a rewriting of gravitational dynamics and attempt to understand what it implies for the boundary-bulk map.
In terms of what is known thus far, here is what I found:
- there is work at the level of mapping non-linear AdS solutions [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.01296.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.01296.pdf), as well as written correlation functions of conserved currents in terms of amplitudes [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.11129.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.11129.pdf) (I think this bears on [@Diandian Wang](https://tasi2021.slack.com/team/U0240H8K0G5)’s question as well).
- One potential connection is the is the recent discussion of AdS correlators from the ambitwistor string, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.06574.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.06574.pdf) and [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.07234.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.07234.pdf). This appears to me to be an interesting venue to explore the question.
- Another avenue for understanding this might be 3d gravity: there is a decomposition of pure EH gravity in terms of 2 copies of SL(2) CS theory. I’d like to interpret this as a double copy structure (though one with both sides being topological has no obvious scattering interpretation). Perhaps someone here has thought about this connection?
--->